Sunday, August 28, 2011

Another victim of Yusuf Estes' lies - Pharaoh preserved part 4

Here's why it's important to spread the truth...Another message left for me on Youtube:

PROVE TO ME THAT HE (Bucaille) WORKED FOR THE ROYAL FAMILY AND ILL BELIEVE YOU, GIVE ME FACTS NOT OPINIONS, PHAROAH SON, WAS THE ONE, THEY FOUND SALT IN HIS SYSTEM WHICH PROVES HE WAS DROWNED AND EXPLAIN TO ME HOW ON EARTH THE BODY IS INTACT WITHOUT BIENG MUMMIFIED
This poor individual believes the lies spread by Yusuf Estes et al.
To recap:
1. Bucaille worked as the physician to King Faisal of Saudi Arabia in 1973. Any internet search can find this fact in seconds. Why did this poster not do some research?
2. Salt in the mummy is because of Natron - "a naturally occurring mixture of sodium carbonate decahydrate (Na2CO3·10H2O, a kind of soda ash) and about 17% sodium bicarbonate (also called nahcolite or baking soda, NaHCO3) along with small quantities of household salt (halite, sodium chloride) and sodium sulfate...Historical natron was harvested directly as a salt mixture from dry lake beds in Ancient Egypt...The mineral was used to preserve mummies in Egypt because it absorbs water and behaves as a drying agent." link
3. Where the lie about the mummies not being mummified comes from I have no idea, as even Bucaille doesn't say this. And yet thousands of  Muslims believe it.
A large proportion of the humanity is being brain-washed and we seem to be incapable of stopping it...

Addendum: I shall relay further exchanges with this Youtube user in the comments section..

6 comments:

  1. lets say he worked for them, if hes giving false scientific evidence, dont you think other scientists would have researched and proved him wrong. cum on u just dont wana believe the holy quran.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well they did but you don't search and What he's saying is right I'm Egyptian :P and there nothing saying that Moses was in Egypt

      Delete
  2. Other scientists HAVE proved him wrong. Not one reputable scientist says the natron (salt) in he body is anything to do with drowning - it's a preserving chemical that was used by the ancient Egyptians. Can you provide ONE SINGLE PIECE OF EVIDENCE to support your claim by any independent scientist that the body of Merneptah was NOT mummified or that the salt proves he drowned? How about you look "natron" up in wikipaedia then come back to me and tell me the salt found proves drowning.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Also Morris Buccaile mentioned what says "and the results of the medical investigations came to support the previous assumption, as in the year 1975 a lameness extraction from a small muscular tissue occurred in Cairo, with the valuable help that professor Michfl Durigon offered. And the accurate microscopical examination showed the perfect preserved status for the smallest dissectional muscular parts continued .......

    ReplyDelete
  4. not entirely sure what you think this proves? Apart from the fact the English makes no sense: "a lameness extraction from a small muscular tissue occurred in Cairo" means what exactly?

    And by the way, do you remember writing: PROVE TO ME THAT HE WORKED FOR THE ROYAL FAMILY AND ILL BELIEVE YOU"...? You then accept that Bucaille did work for the Saudi royal family: "let's say he worked for them", but refuse to accept the truth... that this is all lies to con you into believing

    ReplyDelete
  5. i agree that it was an extraction of lameness

    ReplyDelete